Implementing Quality Function Deployment for Blazer Manufacturing

Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a structured approach to defining customer needs and translating them into specific plans to produce products to meet those needs. It provides a means to identify and carry customer requirements through each stage of product development and production. Implementing QFD can benefit blazer manufacturing in various ways, including improving product quality, reducing costs, and accelerating time-to-market. This article will discuss the key steps involved in planning for QFD implementation in a blazer manufacturing facility.

First, we will examine the blazer manufacturing process to understand how each step contributes to the final product. This helps identify areas that impact customer satisfaction and product quality. Next, we will construct a House of Quality matrix to translate customer desires into technical requirements for blazer production. This matrix allows us to rank technical requirements and set targets for measurement. Finally, we will discuss carrying out the QFD methodology on the manufacturing floor, including training, documentation, quality control, and integration into systems like production planning.

Effective QFD implementation can help blazer manufacturers improve the quality and value of their products based on a strong customer focus. This article provides an overview of key planning steps as an introduction to implementing QFD for the first time or improving existing quality programs. Careful planning creates a solid foundation for the successful deployment of QFD.

Understanding the Blazer Manufacturing Process

The first step in planning for QFD implementation is gaining a detailed understanding of the blazer manufacturing process. This helps identify critical steps that impact final product quality and customer satisfaction. The blazer production process can be broken down into four main phases:

Design and Pattern Making

The blazer design is drafted based on customer and market inputs. This involves creating a pattern that serves as a template for cutting fabric pieces. The design determines essential elements like lapel style, pockets, vents, buttons, etc. Poor pattern drafting can lead to improper fit and discomfort for the customer.

Fabric Cutting

Fabric pieces are cut from rolls or spreads of material based on the blazer pattern. Precision is vital to ensure proper alignment of fabric grains and print patterns after sewing. Defects like misaligned plaids or uneven hems dissatisfy customers.

Sewing and Assembly

Blazer components are sewn together, including attaching linings, interfacing, padding, sleeves, collars, and various inner and outer fabric pieces. Stitching errors negatively impact durability, function, and visual appearance.

Pressing and Finishing

The completed blazers are pressed to remove wrinkles and give a crisp finish. Additional steps may include trimming threads, adding buttons, and final inspections. Poor pressing and finishing reduces quality and purchase appeal.

Understanding the interconnectivity between these processes is key. Issues in pattern making propagate to cutting and sewing. Improper sewing leads to defects noticed in finishing. By recognizing these links, impactful technical requirements can be developed during QFD planning.

Developing the House of Quality for Blazers

The House of Quality is a matrix used in QFD to translate customer desires into technical requirements. It allows manufacturers to rank and prioritize technical factors that meet customer needs. Constructing a House of Quality involves several steps:

Identifying Customer Requirements

This first section lists attributes and benefits desired by blazer buyers. Examples include quality materials, precise fit, durable construction, appealing design, comfortable feel, affordable pricing, etc. These requirements can be gathered through customer interviews, focus groups, surveys, reviews of competitors, and past sales results.

Technical Requirements

This involves determining technical requirements for blazer production that impact customer satisfaction. Examples are pattern precision, fabric quality, seam allowances, stitching equipment, quality testing processes, etc. These specifications can be derived from the manufacturing process analysis.

Relationship Matrix

A matrix between customer requirements and technical requirements allows rating the correlations between the two lists. Symbols indicate the strength of relationships. This quantifies how technical factors influence overall customer satisfaction.

Technical Correlations

This square matrix along the roof indicates where technical requirements correlate with and affect other technicals. Positive and negative correlations are marked.

Target Values

Technical measurement goals are defined to meet customer requirement levels. This also sets development priorities.

Competitive Analysis

Existing blazer products can be benchmarked to indicate where technical strengths and weaknesses lie relative to competitors.

Creating the House of Quality highlights the critical technical requirements for delivering blazers that satisfy customers. This matrix provides vital inputs for the implementation phase.

Implementing QFD in Blazer Manufacturing

The third stage of QFD planning is defining the actual changes and actions needed in blazer manufacturing to meet technical requirements per the House of Quality. This involves:

Prioritizing Technical Requirements

The priority for technical requirements is determined from the relationship matrix. Stakeholders agree on rankings to focus efforts on customer-critical areas.

Developing Process Controls

Standard operating procedures and control plans are created for high priority technical requirements. These define activities like measurements, machine settings, quality checks, etc. to reduce variations.

Quality Assurance Integration

Inspection points, success criteria, and testing methods are instituted to verify technical requirement standards. This integrates quality control throughout the process.

Training Employees

Workers at each stage of production are trained on the new QFD approach. This includes instruction on technical priorities, procedures, documentation, and their role.

Production Planning Alignment

QFD data helps develop machine maintenance plans, capacity planning, inventory control, scheduling, and other aspects to improve quality and efficiency.

Continual Improvement

Feedback systems like production meetings and customer surveys help collect inputs to enhance QFD over time. Control plans are refined and updated accordingly.

Effective implementation requires commitment at all levels of the organization. With training, documentation, and integration into systems, QFD can transform blazer manufacturing. The House of Quality provides the blueprint for driving improvements through a customer focus.


QFD provides blazer manufacturers with a structured methodology to build products that proactively satisfy customer needs. Careful planning is required to analyze manufacturing processes, identify technical requirements, construct the relationship matrix, and define implementation activities. The House of Quality matrix is central to translating customer desires into technical priorities. Ongoing refinement and integration of QFD leads to continuous improvements in quality and efficiency. With diligent cross-functional preparation and execution, manufacturers can leverage QFD to exceed customer expectations for tailored blazers. This structured approach transforms the voice of the customer into measurable technical strategies to drive innovation.


  • Govers, C. P. M. (2001). QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(2), 151-159.
  • Mazur, G. (1993). QFD for small business: a shortcut through the maze of matrices. Quality Progress, 26(2), 61-64.
  • Akao, Y., & Mazur, G. H. (2003). The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 20-35.
  • Crowe, T. J., & Cheng, C. C. (1996). Using quality function deployment in manufacturing strategic planning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(4), 35-48.